The summit meeting of the leaders of China and the United States in Washington appears to signal a rapprochement between the two superpowers. President Trump has repeatedly referred to what he calls "G2", without mentioning "G7" or "G20", the groups that include many more countries. This development is seen as positive for world peace but it diminishes India's significance as a "counterweight to China" and the benefits Indians expected to flow from the US-China confrontation in Asia.
 |
| President Trump Personally Welcomed President Xi at Andrews Air Force Base |
The fact that President Trump personally received President Xi at Andrews Air Force Base upon his arrival is yet another indication that the US now recognizes China as a peer competitor. President Xi, for his part, has talked about the need for the two superpowers to avoid the "Thucydides Trap", a reference to the potential for war between an established superpower and a rising superpower.
Top American officials have been preparing for this moment for several years. In an interview on Fox News, Secretary of State Marco Rubio told Brian Kilmeade in 2025 that “China is going to be a rich and powerful country. No matter what we do, that’s what – we’re going to have to deal with that. But we have to deal with the reality. What we cannot have is a world where China is so powerful, we depend on them. And that’s right now where we’re headed, unfortunately. That’s going to change. That’s going to change under President Trump”.
Anthony Blinken who preceded Secretary Rubio made a similar acknowledgement earlier in 2022: “China is the only country with both the intent to reshape the international order and, increasingly, the economic, diplomatic, military and technological power to do it,”
"One of the most complex and arguably most important relationships we have is the one with China. There are aspects of contestation, there are aspects of cooperation, and we want to avoid conflict. They're a lot bigger than we are, their market's a lot bigger, their manufacturing is three times ours, they've got more ships, they put forward more papers and more patents. As strong and as powerful as we are, playing one-on-one can be tough", Blinken added later in 2023.
The Beijing-Washington rapprochement is clearly in Pakistan's interest. Islamabad has long sought to balance its foreign policy between China and the United States through a pragmatic hedging strategy, gaining economic, military, and diplomatic benefits from both superpowers while maintaining strategic autonomy. But the relationship between Pakistan and China is not the same as the one between Pakistan and the United States. Pakistan's ties with China are strategic while those with the United States remain tactical and transactional. What has changed recently is that Pakistan is no longer waging war to help the United States as it did during the "Cold War" and the "War on Terror". Instead, Pakistan has emerged as a peacemaker between the US and Iran.
Related Links:
Haq's Musings
South Asia Investor Review
Pakistan Downs India's French Rafale Jets in a Major Aerial Battle
Has Modi Succeeded Diplomatically or Militarily Against Pakistan After Pahalgam?
Pakistan-Saudi Defense Pact
Pakistan's Key Role in US-Iran Ceasefire
Has Modi Succeeded Militarily or Diplomatically in Isolating Pakistan After "Operation Sindoor"?
China, Pakistan to "Further Deepen and Expand" Ties
Modi's India: A Paper Elephant?
Pahalgam Attack: Why is the Indian Media Not Asking Hard Questions?
Ukraine's Lesson For Pakistan: Never Give Up Nukes!
Pakistan Economy Nears Trillion Dollars
Pakistan's Sea-Based Second Strike Capability
Riaz Haq Youtube Channel
VPOS Youtube Channel
1 comment:
- "This development is seen as positive for world peace but it diminishes India's significance as a 'counterweight to China', and the benefits Indians expected to flow from the US-China confrontation in Asia.. The Beijing-Washington rapprochement is clearly in Pakistan's interest."
I guess this pretty much sums up the two reasons you have bothered with a writeup on this. A 'potential' US-China rapproachment 'supposedly' weakens India while strengthening Pakistan - a zero-sum game where the gain for one country is seen as a loss for the other. As in the case of your writeup on Mecca pact (which you rather 'hoped' was a Muslim counterweight against Israel rather than Saudi's desperate Plan B against the threat posed by Iran and the Houthis) I have a feeling this is more of a reflection of your wishful thinking rather than ground realities.
As for the Xi-Trump summit, the news I came across in BBC yesterday suggested it was more spectacle than substance - hardly surprising considering one of the two involved is Trump.
"Trump and Xi exchange warm words at state dinner but little progress on key issues"
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cxq63dqp93n1o
"Xi got Trump's red carpet welcome - but not everything he wanted"
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cr93e4x7kdjjo
Let's keep in mind a stark fact - Trump is perhaps the only US President in a century (or ever) who managed to alienate America's staunchest allies more than its adversaries. He gets along better with the likes of Xi, Putin and Kim Jong Un than the democratic leaders of the West. What bizzare times do we live in when the sitting US President tweets a map of US, Canada and Greenland in American colours and the Canadian PM even talks of the hypothetical possibility of a US invasion of Canada?
Does Trump represent the new mould of US leadership from now on? Can Trump's unpredictable swings be considered the framework of US foreign policy going forward? Or is this more of a temporary abberation that will not be replicated by the succeeding US administrations?
That said, there is indeed no question of the reality of "G2". The days of American hegemony is coming to an end and US and China are effectively the two superpowers in the world today. Whether the coming years will see rapproachment between the two superpowers or intensifying rivalry - and how other players like India or Pakistan fit in them - remains to be seen.
Post a Comment